Michael Schembri

25 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Michael Schembri
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 79
  • Pharmacy 28
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Clinical Psychology 102
  • Reproductive Medicine 39
Replace Suzette Morelock with:
Suzette Morelock United States
Anke Samulowitz Sweden
Karen Barnard United States
Rosalı́a Santed Spain
Nicole L. Mihalopoulos United States
Mary B. Pierce United Kingdom
Bill Whitehead United Kingdom
Lorena Binfa Chile
Holly Nicole Essex United Kingdom
Allison Mitchinson United States
Michael Schembri relative to Suzette Morelock United States Suzette Morelock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×16.3×
Suzette Morelock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Schembri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Schembri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Schembri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Schembri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Schembri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Schembri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Schembri. The network helps show where Michael Schembri may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Schembri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Schembri Line = papers co-authored together Michael Schembri links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003142
2 2010100
3 201465
4 201353
5 201443
6 201542
7 201437
8 200436
9 201823
10 201423
11 201918
12 201717
13 202215
14 201615
15 201812
16 202410
17 20245
18 20234
19 20234
20 20153

About Michael Schembri

Michael Schembri is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rheumatology, Reproductive Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 676 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (5 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (79 citations), Pharmacy (28 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (102 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (39 citations). Michael Schembri has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include James P. Marcin, Patrick S. Romano, Leslee L. Subak, Rena R. Wing, J. Paul Leigh, Vanessa L. Jacoby, Amy A. Gorin, Jacki Hecht, Gary Foster and Delia Smith West. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Public Health, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact