Michael S. Loop

879 citations
46 papers · 752 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael S. Loop

45 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

Michael S. Loop
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 330
  • Sensory Systems 65
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 250
  • Developmental Biology 18
  • Ophthalmology 59
Replace A.M. Granda with:
A.M. Granda United States
G. H. Jacobs United States
Michael A. Crognale United States
Henri Gioanni France
J. F. W. Nuboer Netherlands
Gary A. Williams United States
Christa Neumeyer Germany
Alison M. Harman Australia
Hermann Sch�ne Germany
ELLENGENE H. PETERSON United States
Michael S. Loop relative to A.M. Granda United States A.M. Granda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
A.M. Granda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Loop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Loop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Loop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Loop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Loop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Loop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Loop. The network helps show where Michael S. Loop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Loop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael S. Loop Line = papers co-authored together Michael S. Loop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978167
2 197653
3 197750
4 197836
5 197236
6 198734
7 199432
8 198223
9 197523
10 197721
11
Temporal contrast sensitivity in amblyopia.
198220
12 198019
13 200718
14 197917
15 198016
16 198313
17 196912
18 197011
19 197810
20 197510

About Michael S. Loop

Michael S. Loop is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Sensory Systems, having authored 46 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Color perception and design (5 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers) and Color Science and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (330 citations), Sensory Systems (65 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (250 citations), Developmental Biology (18 citations) and Ophthalmology (59 citations). Michael S. Loop has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Leonard Kass, Peter H. Hartline, S. Murray Sherman, Dolores M. Schroeder, Steven H. Schwartz, Mark A. Berkley, C. Leigh Millican, Laura L. Bruce, Douglas C. Smith and Jerry L. Klein. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Visual Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Brain Research and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact