Michael Proctor

74 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Michael Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Linguistics and Language 294
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 665
  • Signal Processing 335
  • Artificial Intelligence 474
  • Language and Linguistics 121
Replace Katherine Haker with:
Katherine Haker United States
Suzanne Boyce United States
Philip Hoole Germany
Khalil Iskarous United States
Luís M. T. Jesus Portugal
Phil Hoole Germany
Christine H. Shadle United States
Michel T. T. Jackson United States
Jacqueline Vaissière France
Donna Erickson United States
Michael Proctor relative to Katherine Haker United States Katherine Haker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Katherine Haker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Proctor. The network helps show where Michael Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Michael Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014126
2 201164
3
Gestural Characterization of a Phonological Class: The Liquids.
200960
4 201056
5 201155
6 201154
7 201045
8 201341
9 201839
10 201036
11 201334
12 201333
13 199532
14 201231
15 201129
16 201327
17 201124
18 201620
19 201319
20 201919

About Michael Proctor

Michael Proctor is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics and Language, Signal Processing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (66 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (37 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (29 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (14 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (8 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (294 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (665 citations), Signal Processing (335 citations), Artificial Intelligence (474 citations) and Language and Linguistics (121 citations). Michael Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shrikanth Narayanan, Khalil Iskarous, Christine H. Shadle, Louis Goldstein, Adam Lammert, Krishna S. Nayak, Athanasios Katsamanis, Shrikanth Narayanan, Vikram Ramanarayanan and Erik Bresch. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Journal of Phonetics, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing and Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact