The Imaging Science Journal

840 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 840 papers published in The Imaging Science Journal in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in The Imaging Science Journal usually cover Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (536 papers), Media Technology (151 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (85 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (124 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (114 papers) and Image and Signal Denoising Methods (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Imaging Science Journal are M. Richardson, Peter Yuen, E.R. Davies, Yu‐Chen Hu, S.B. Ross-Murphy, Vijay Kumar, Garry Thomson, Dilbag Singh, C. C. Chang and E. F. J. Ring.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Imaging Science Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Imaging Science Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Imaging Science Journal.

Countries where authors publish in The Imaging Science Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Imaging Science Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Imaging Science Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Imaging Science Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025