Michael Pohl

5.6k citations
50 papers · 842 · h-index 19

Impact in

    • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Oncology top 10%
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Papers in

Michael Pohl

47 papers receiving 808 citations

Peers

Michael Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Gastroenterology 54
  • Oncology 261
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 218
  • Cancer Research 99
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 91
Replace Tao Jin with:
Tao Jin China
Cun Liao China
Seong Yoon Yi South Korea
Hamed Daw United States
Hacı Mehmet Türk Türkiye
Hideo Takamatsu Japan
Ricardo Cubedo Spain
Yoon Suk Lee South Korea
Matthew Zapf United States
Neta Goldschmidt Israel
Michael Pohl relative to Tao Jin China Tao Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Tao Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pohl. The network helps show where Michael Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202163
2 201353
3 201552
4 200650
5 201149
6 202247
7 201441
8 202038
9
SMAD4 mediates mesenchymal-epithelial reversion in SW480 colon carcinoma cells.
201036
10 201835
11 201133
12 200828
13 201127
14 199727
15 200926
16 200523
17 201521
18 200919
19 201619
20 200918

About Michael Pohl

Michael Pohl is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 50 papers that have together received 842 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (8 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers) and Sodium Intake and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (54 citations), Oncology (261 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (218 citations), Cancer Research (99 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (91 citations). Michael Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Wolff Schmiegel, Ulrike John, Tomáš Seeman, Andrea Tannapfel, Anke Reinacher‐Schick, Roland Schroers, Ullrich Graeven, Peter Thuss‐Patience, Susanne Klein‐Scory and Alexander Baraniskin. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Nephrology, European Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Kidney & Blood Pressure Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact