Michael Pohl

5.5k citations
48 papers · 780 · h-index 18

Impact in

    • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Oncology top 10%
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
    • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Papers in

Michael Pohl

47 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Michael Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Gastroenterology 71
  • Oncology 290
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 267
  • Cancer Research 109
  • Hepatology 50
Replace Karen Mulder with:
Karen Mulder Canada
Hideo Takamatsu Japan
Kyoung Ha Kim South Korea
Mert Başaran Türkiye
Doğan Uncu Türkiye
M. Biakhov Russia
Hamed Daw United States
Calogero Cipolla Italy
Renu Madan India
Emre Balık Türkiye
Michael Pohl relative to Karen Mulder Canada Karen Mulder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Karen Mulder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pohl. The network helps show where Michael Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202159
2 201353
3 201550
4 200646
5 202242
6 201139
7 201439
8 202037
9
SMAD4 mediates mesenchymal-epithelial reversion in SW480 colon carcinoma cells.
201035
10 201834
11 200827
12 201126
13 201124
14 199724
15 200522
16 201520
17 200920
18 201619
19 200917
20 200917

About Michael Pohl

Michael Pohl is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Nephrology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 780 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (11 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (4 papers) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (71 citations), Oncology (290 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (267 citations), Cancer Research (109 citations) and Hepatology (50 citations). Michael Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Wolff Schmiegel, Ulrike John, Andrea Tannapfel, Tomáš Seeman, Anke Reinacher‐Schick, Ullrich Graeven, Roland Schroers, Susanne Klein‐Scory, Peter Thuss‐Patience and Thomas Ruzicka. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cancer, Pediatric Nephrology, Kidney & Blood Pressure Research, Annals of Oncology and International Journal of Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact