Michael Pfeil

36 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Michael Pfeil
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Family Practice 15
  • General Health Professions 95
  • Pharmacy 15
  • Neurology 25
Replace Sakineh Gholamzadeh with:
Sakineh Gholamzadeh Iran
Arash Najimi Iran
Zeynep Güngörmüş Türkiye
Caralise W. Hunt United States
Carrol Zhou Canada
Lila de Tantillo United States
William Laughey United Kingdom
Maebh Barry Ireland
Ana Isabel Parro‐Moreno Spain
John H. Littlefield United States
Michael Pfeil relative to Sakineh Gholamzadeh Iran Sakineh Gholamzadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Sakineh Gholamzadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pfeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pfeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pfeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pfeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pfeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pfeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pfeil. The network helps show where Michael Pfeil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pfeil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pfeil Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pfeil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201436
2 201033
3 201325
4 201025
5 201323
6 201318
7 201414
8 200113
9 201013
10 199411
11 200711
12 201111
13 201511
14 200510
15 201110
16
Ensuring primary care reaches the âhard to reachâ
20048
17 20038
18 20118
19 20128
20
The skills-teaching myth in nurse education. From Florence Nightingale to project 2000.
20037

About Michael Pfeil

Michael Pfeil is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Surgery, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (4 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (15 citations), Family Practice (15 citations), General Health Professions (95 citations), Pharmacy (15 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Michael Pfeil has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kenda Crozier, Alex J. MacGregor, Bruce Lindsay, Allan Clark, K. Sabanathan, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Katherine Deane, Paul Worth, Richard Gray and Andy Goldberg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Health Care, Nurse Researcher, Trials, Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare and Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact