Michaël Otte

64 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers

Michaël Otte
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Theoretical Computer Science 99
  • History and Philosophy of Science 84
  • Statistics and Probability 115
  • Education 384
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 20
Replace Jeffrey Nunemacher with:
Jeffrey Nunemacher United States
Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos United States
Uffe Thomas Jankvist Denmark
Michael De Villiers South Africa
Joseph W. Dauben United States
Uri Leron Israel
Lara Alcock United Kingdom
Zalman Usiskin United States
Eddie Gray United Kingdom
Annie Selden United States
Michaël Otte relative to Jeffrey Nunemacher United States Jeffrey Nunemacher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Jeffrey Nunemacher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Otte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Otte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Otte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Otte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Otte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Otte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Otte. The network helps show where Michaël Otte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Otte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Otte Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Otte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986162
2 201365
3 198650
4 200636
5 199127
6 197322
7 197422
8 199022
9
Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History And Philosophy
200119
10 199819
11 196919
12 198918
13
Das Formale, das Soziale und das Subjektive : eine Einführung in die Philosophie und Didaktik der Mathematik
199416
14 200316
15 200714
16 200314
17 199411
18 199711
19 201110
20 199110

About Michaël Otte

Michaël Otte is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (18 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (14 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (9 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (4 papers) and Education Methods and Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (99 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (84 citations), Statistics and Probability (115 citations), Education (384 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (20 citations). Michaël Otte has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include B. Christiansen, Nikolaus Correll, Wolf Barth, Guy Brousseau, Marco Panza, Hans Niels Jahnke, Johannes Lenhard, Lorraine Daston, Christine Keitel and Falk Seeger. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Studies in Mathematics, Foundations of Science, Science in Context, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters and Mathematische Annalen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact