Michael Osborn

681 citations
16 papers · 477 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Osborn

13 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Michael Osborn
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Philosophy 181
  • Literature and Literary Theory 173
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 158
  • Communication 72
  • Language and Linguistics 57
Replace Richard L. Lanigan with:
Richard L. Lanigan United States
Charles Arthur Willard United States
W. Ross Winterowd United States
Thomas S. Frentz United States
Manfred Jahn Germany
Bruce Herzberg United States
Inge Crosman
S. Michael Halloran United States
Leo Groarke Canada
Calvin O. Schräg United States
Michael Osborn relative to Richard L. Lanigan United States Richard L. Lanigan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Richard L. Lanigan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Osborn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Osborn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Osborn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Osborn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Osborn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Osborn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Osborn. The network helps show where Michael Osborn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Osborn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Osborn Line = papers co-authored together Michael Osborn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1967138
2
Why Communication Is Important: A Rationale for the Centrality of the Study of Communication.
200085
3 196277
4 196666
5 197748
6 199020
7 199812
8
Public Speaking: Finding Your Voice
201110
9 20099
10 20045
11 20183
12 19862
13
The Play of Metaphors
19971
14 19831
15 19790
16 20060

About Michael Osborn

Michael Osborn is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (8 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), Media Studies and Communication (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper) and Philippine History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (181 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (173 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (158 citations), Communication (72 citations) and Language and Linguistics (57 citations). Michael Osborn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Ehninger, John Waite Bowers, Sherwyn P. Morreale, Judy C. Pearson, Kathleen J. Turner, David A. Thomas, Matthew W. Seeger and Lawrence R. Frey. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Communication Studies, Rhetoric and Public Affairs, Communication Education and Southern Communication Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact