Michael Naas
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
Papers in
- Philosophy 29
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 23
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 4
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
-
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 6
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 3
- Political Theology and Sovereignty 2
- Co-authors
- Pascale-Anne Brault (11 shared papers)Jacques Derrida (10 shared papers)Peggy Kamuf (2 shared papers)Jean‐Luc Nancy (1 shared paper)Nouri Gana (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- SubStance (3 papers)Critical Inquiry (3 papers)CR The New Centennial Review (3 papers)Oxford Literary Review (2 papers)Angelaki (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Naas
37 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Philosophy 218
- Literature and Literary Theory 94
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 37
- Geography, Planning and Development 31
- Cultural Studies 43
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Naas
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Naas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Naas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Naas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Naas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Naas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Naas. The network helps show where Michael Naas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Michael Naas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins | 1993 | 115 |
| 2 | Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas | 1999 | 64 |
| 3 | 1994 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 29 | |
| 6 | Chaque fois unique, la fin du monde | 2003 | 28 |
| 7 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 20 | Cada vez única, el fin del mundo | 2005 | 3 |
About Michael Naas
Michael Naas is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 50 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (23 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (6 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (3 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (218 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (94 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (37 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (31 citations) and Cultural Studies (43 citations). Michael Naas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pascale-Anne Brault, Jacques Derrida, Peggy Kamuf, Jean‐Luc Nancy and Nouri Gana. Their work appears in journals such as SubStance, Critical Inquiry, CR The New Centennial Review, Oxford Literary Review and Angelaki.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.