Michael Moses

932 citations
13 papers · 624 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Moses

12 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Michael Moses
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 456
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 103
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 285
  • Urban Studies 56
  • Management Information Systems 80
Replace Rachel Campbell with:
Rachel Campbell Netherlands
Amy Whitaker United States
Renato G. Flôres Brazil
John L. Kling United States
William Quinn United Kingdom
Chris Nosko United States
Georgia Kosmopoulou United States
Kumar R. Sarangee United States
Phillip A. Cartwright United States
Volker Trommsdorff Germany
Michael Moses relative to Rachel Campbell Netherlands Rachel Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.7×
Rachel Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Moses

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Moses's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Moses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Moses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Moses

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Moses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Moses. The network helps show where Michael Moses may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael Moses, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Moses Line = papers co-authored together Michael Moses links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2002309
2 200586
3 200076
4 200274
5 197337
6 201514
7
Anchoring or Loss Aversion? Empirical Evidence from Art Auctions
20147
8
Beautiful Asset: Art as Investment
20056
9
Are Investors Credulous? Some Preliminary Evidence from Art Auctions
20026
10 20226
11 20222
12 20141
13
Wealth Management for Collectors
20100

About Michael Moses

Michael Moses is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art History and Market Analysis (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (4 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers) and Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (456 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (103 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (285 citations), Urban Studies (56 citations) and Management Information Systems (80 citations). Michael Moses has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jianping Mei, Sridhar Seshadri, William F. Hamilton, Jeffrey D. Kubik, Ilan Kremer, Harrison Hong, Kathryn Graddy, Rachel A.J. Pownall and Funsho Olaitan Kolawole. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Journal of Finance, The RAND Journal of Economics, Operations Research and The Faculty Digital Archive (New York University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact