Michael Moos

1.2k citations
28 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Moos

28 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

Michael Moos
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Organic Chemistry 566
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 184
  • Materials Chemistry 328
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 122
  • Polymers and Plastics 71
Replace Mehmet Emin Cinar with:
Mehmet Emin Cinar Germany
M. R. Ajayakumar India
Toshikazu Kitagawa Japan
Shaobin Miao China
Francisco Otón Spain
Akihito Konishi Japan
Jens U. Engelhart Germany
Ivan S. Neretin Russia
Daiki Shimizu Japan
Zheng Yuan Canada
Michael Moos relative to Mehmet Emin Cinar Germany Mehmet Emin Cinar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Mehmet Emin Cinar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Moos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Moos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Moos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Moos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Moos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Moos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Moos. The network helps show where Michael Moos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Moos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Moos Line = papers co-authored together Michael Moos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017108
2 2020100
3 201288
4 201773
5 201965
6 201864
7 201760
8 202157
9 201955
10 201952
11 201750
12 201941
13 201939
14 201135
15 201931
16 201429
17 202426
18 202219
19 202418
20 202016

About Michael Moos

Michael Moos is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (13 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (8 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (4 papers), Organoboron and organosilicon chemistry (3 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (3 papers) and Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (566 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (184 citations), Materials Chemistry (328 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (122 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (71 citations). Michael Moos has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Lambert, Ivo Krummenacher, Holger Braunschweig, Todd B. Marder, Marco Holzapfel, Frank Würthner, Alexandra Friedrich, Ji Lei, Alexander Schmiedel and Julia Merz. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Nature Communications and Chemical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact