Michael Moir

1.0k citations
35 papers · 870 · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
    • Hops Chemistry and Applications

Papers in

Michael Moir

34 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Michael Moir
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Toxicology 202
  • Pharmacology 158
  • Pharmacology 199
  • Organic Chemistry 224
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
Replace Shen‐Jeu Won with:
Shen‐Jeu Won Taiwan
K. Szendrei Germany
Miwa Kubo Japan
Yoshinori Shiobara Japan
Mohammed Hawash Palestinian Territory
Ghulam Abbas Miana Pakistan
Costantino Floris Italy
Nitirat Chimnoi Thailand
Guangzhong Tu China
R. S. Kapil India
Michael Moir relative to Shen‐Jeu Won Taiwan Shen‐Jeu Won's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Shen‐Jeu Won · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Moir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Moir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Moir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Moir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Moir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Moir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Moir. The network helps show where Michael Moir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Moir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Moir Line = papers co-authored together Michael Moir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015206
2 2019181
3 2000141
4 197332
5 197330
6 197326
7 201923
8 201721
9 197320
10 197419
11 197318
12 202216
13 197215
14 199213
15 197611
16 201710
17 198010
18 197510
19 20248
20 19807

About Michael Moir

Michael Moir is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 870 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Hops Chemistry and Applications (4 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (3 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (202 citations), Pharmacology (158 citations), Pharmacology (199 citations), Organic Chemistry (224 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (110 citations). Michael Moir has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kassiou, Ronald H. Thomson, Tristan A. Reekie, Jonathan J. Danon, Mark Connor, Samuel D. Banister, Richard C. Kevin, Iain S. McGregor, Jordyn Stuart and Katie Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1, Phytochemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Helvetica Chimica Acta and European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact