Michael McCue

66 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael McCue
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Research and Theory 34
  • Rehabilitation 172
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 218
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Occupational Therapy 52
Replace Felicity Astin with:
Felicity Astin United Kingdom
Huda Huijer Abu‐Saad Netherlands
Pauline Campbell United Kingdom
Doris Sau Fung Yu Hong Kong
David Clarke United Kingdom
Cynthia Teel United States
Lauren Terhorst United States
Christine Brulin Sweden
Siv Söderberg Sweden
Janet C. Meininger United States
Michael McCue relative to Felicity Astin United Kingdom Felicity Astin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Felicity Astin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael McCue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael McCue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael McCue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael McCue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael McCue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael McCue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael McCue. The network helps show where Michael McCue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael McCue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael McCue Line = papers co-authored together Michael McCue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004190
2 2009154
3 201394
4 198881
5 201572
6
Nurse staffing, quality, and financial performance.
200368
7 200953
8 201547
9 201545
10 201243
11 199043
12 199241
13 200339
14 198737
15 198833
16 201330
17 201229
18 201029
19 199528
20 202024

About Michael McCue

Michael McCue is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (4 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (3 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (34 citations), Rehabilitation (172 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (218 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations) and Occupational Therapy (52 citations). Michael McCue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include David W. Harless, Barbara A. Mark, Andrea D. Fairman, Gérald Goldstein, Michael Pramuka, Bambang Parmanto, Yihua Xu, Elizabeth R. Skidmore, Brad E. Dicianno and Joan C. Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Telerehabilitation, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Rehabilitation Psychology, American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact