Michael M. Auer

4.5k citations
149 papers · 3.4k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. Auer

142 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Michael M. Auer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Clinical Psychology 1.3k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 928
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 49
  • General Decision Sciences 51
  • Applied Psychology 132
Replace Maureen J. O’Sullivan with:
Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland
Amy K. Kiefer United States
Ilaria Castelli Italy
Mark J. Benson United States
Linda J Titus United States
Eric Anderson United States
Sebastian Ullrich Germany
Dominique‐Laurent Couturier United Kingdom
Masahiro Toda Japan
James A. Russell United States
Michael M. Auer relative to Maureen J. O’Sullivan Ireland Maureen J. O’Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49×
Maureen J. O’Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Auer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Auer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Auer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Auer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Auer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Auer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Auer. The network helps show where Michael M. Auer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. Auer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. Auer Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. Auer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012152
2 2016102
3 201597
4 201593
5 201488
6 201787
7 201680
8 201574
9 202072
10 200666
11 201665
12 201662
13 201362
14 202159
15 201958
16 200458
17 202056
18 200556
19 201253
20 200553

About Michael M. Auer

Michael M. Auer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics and Oncology, having authored 149 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (53 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (47 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (26 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (16 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (12 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (11 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (928 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (49 citations), General Decision Sciences (51 citations) and Applied Psychology (132 citations). Michael M. Auer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Mark Damian Griffiths, Florian Deisenhammer, Harald Hegen, Franziska Di Pauli, Gabriel Bsteh, Thomas Berger, Klaus Berek, Sebastian Wurth, Anne Zinganell and Kypros H. Nicolaides. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, European Journal of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact