Nicholas McDowell

738 citations
53 papers · 287 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • History top 1%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Scottish History and National Identity
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Nicholas McDowell

34 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Nicholas McDowell
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • History 186
  • Classics 51
  • Literature and Literary Theory 103
  • Religious studies 39
  • Museology 24
Replace Mihoko Suzuki with:
Mihoko Suzuki United States
Sharon Achinstein United States
Helen Hackett United Kingdom
Paul Salzman Australia
Andrew Cambers United States
Marie‐Louise Coolahan Ireland
Elizabeth Heale United Kingdom
Adam Smyth United Kingdom
F. J. Levy United States
A. E. B. Coldiron United States
Nicholas McDowell relative to Mihoko Suzuki United States Mihoko Suzuki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mihoko Suzuki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas McDowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas McDowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas McDowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas McDowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas McDowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas McDowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas McDowell. The network helps show where Nicholas McDowell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas McDowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas McDowell Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas McDowell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200852
2 199748
3
The English Radical Imagination: Culture, Religion, and Revolution, 1630-1660
200441
4 200229
5 200827
6 200319
7 20109
8 20208
9 20054
10 20054
11 20034
12 20193
13 20163
14
Vernacular regicide and republican writings
20132
15 20022
16 20112
17 20062
18 20172
19 20032
20 20082

About Nicholas McDowell

Nicholas McDowell is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (12 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (11 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (8 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (186 citations), Classics (51 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (103 citations), Religious studies (39 citations) and Museology (24 citations). Nicholas McDowell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include N. H. Keeble and John Milton. Their work appears in journals such as The Seventeenth Century, Notes and Queries, Critical Quarterly, Milton Studies and Milton Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact