Michael Lesnick

948 citations
12 papers · 263 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Lesnick

11 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Michael Lesnick
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 223
  • Mathematical Physics 116
  • Biophysics 35
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 72
  • Geometry and Topology 24
Replace Omer Bobrowski with:
Omer Bobrowski Israel
Vidit Nanda United Kingdom
Barbara Di Fabio Italy
Henry Adams United States
Danijela Horak Germany
Lori Ziegelmeier United States
Yu. V. Muranov Poland
Elvira Mayordomo Spain
Douglas Harris United States
Michael A. Mandell United States
Michael Lesnick relative to Omer Bobrowski Israel Omer Bobrowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Omer Bobrowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lesnick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lesnick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lesnick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lesnick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lesnick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lesnick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lesnick. The network helps show where Michael Lesnick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lesnick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lesnick Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lesnick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200998
2 201573
3 201828
4 201421
5 202213
6 201911
7 20227
8 20227
9 20233
10 20201
11 20211
12
Feature Ratings and Empirical Dimension-Specific Similarity Explain Distinct Aspects of Semantic Similarity Judgments.
20180

About Michael Lesnick

Michael Lesnick is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 12 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (11 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (7 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper), Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (1 paper) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (223 citations), Mathematical Physics (116 citations), Biophysics (35 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (72 citations) and Geometry and Topology (24 citations). Michael Lesnick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Gunnar Carlsson, Yuan Yao, Leonidas Guibas, Ulrich Bauer, Gregory R. Bowman, Satwinder Singh, Jian Sun, Vijay S. Pande, Xuhui Huang and Jonathan D. Cohen. Their work appears in journals such as Foundations of Computational Mathematics, Discrete & Computational Geometry, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Cognitive Science and Algebraic & Geometric Topology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact