Michael Legge

96 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Legge
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 141
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 128
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 90
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 178
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 221
Replace P. E. Smith with:
P. E. Smith United States
R E Frisch United States
Gil Guerra‐Júnior Brazil
Karen L. Herbst United States
L Gargantini Italy
S Rosberg Sweden
Bruce Kessel United States
Fiona J. Clay Australia
Daniel L. Metzger Canada
David Phillips United Kingdom
Michael Legge relative to P. E. Smith United States P. E. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
P. E. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Legge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Legge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Legge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Legge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Legge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Legge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Legge. The network helps show where Michael Legge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Legge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Legge Line = papers co-authored together Michael Legge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003133
2 1991102
3 200785
4 199581
5 200279
6 201178
7 200263
8 199542
9 200442
10 200240
11 200931
12 200828
13 199425
14 200922
15 200921
16 198019
17 201219
18 199618
19 201318
20 200415

About Michael Legge

Michael Legge is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Genetics, having authored 102 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (11 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (9 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (7 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (141 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (128 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (90 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (178 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (221 citations). Michael Legge has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lynnette M. Jones, Ailsa Goulding, Martin H. Sellens, Debra L. Waters, Ruth Fitzgerald, Michael J. Denton, Stephen D. Bird, J P Stapleton, M C Evans and Andrew Grey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Human Reproduction, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cell Biology International and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact