Michael Leff

1.5k citations
58 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 0.2%
    • Rhetoric and Communication Studies
    • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
    • Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
    • Narrative Theory and Analysis

Papers in

Michael Leff

48 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Michael Leff
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Philosophy 704
  • Literature and Literary Theory 477
  • Communication 223
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
  • Anthropology 72
Replace Edwin Black with:
Edwin Black United States
Leo Groarke Canada
Ruth Amossy Israel
Martin J. Medhurst United States
Richard Leo Enos United States
Steven Mailloux United States
Robert L. Ivie United States
Cheryl Glenn United States
Theresa Enos United States
Dominique Maingueneau France
Michael Leff relative to Edwin Black United States Edwin Black's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Edwin Black · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Leff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Leff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Leff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Leff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Leff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Leff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Leff. The network helps show where Michael Leff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michael Leff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Leff Line = papers co-authored together Michael Leff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198397
2 199074
3 197867
4 197455
5 199249
6 200449
7 198649
8 198048
9 200048
10 197442
11 198337
12 198836
13 199833
14 200328
15 200224
16 200623
17 198923
18 199322
19 200119
20 200916

About Michael Leff

Michael Leff is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Organic Chemistry and Communication, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (26 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (12 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (704 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (477 citations), Communication (223 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations) and Anthropology (72 citations). Michael Leff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include G. P. Mohrmann, Andrea A. Lunsford, Steve Fuller, Alan G. Gross, William J. Keith, Jean Goodwin, Benjamin E. Leiby, David Chen, Ralph J. Marino and Diana D. Cardenas. Their work appears in journals such as Quarterly Journal of Speech, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Argumentation, Rhetoric and Public Affairs and Philosophy and Rhetoric.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact