Michael L. Wayne
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Marketing top 10%
Papers in
-
- Media Studies and Communication 15
- Journals
- The Communication Review (4 papers)Television & New Media (2 papers)Media Culture & Society (2 papers)Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies (2 papers)Journal of cinema and media studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsIsraelUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michael L. Wayne
22 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Communication 114
- Marketing 58
- Cultural Studies 50
- Gender Studies 54
- Urban Studies 26
Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Wayne
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Wayne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Wayne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Wayne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Wayne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Wayne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Wayne. The network helps show where Michael L. Wayne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Wayne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 124 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 19 | Scholars as Audiences, Symbolic Boundaries, and Culturally Legitimated Prime-Time Cable Drama | 2015 | 1 |
| 20 | 2017 | 1 |
About Michael L. Wayne
Michael L. Wayne is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Cultural Studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (15 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Media Influence and Health (3 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (114 citations), Marketing (58 citations), Cultural Studies (50 citations), Gender Studies (54 citations) and Urban Studies (26 citations). Michael L. Wayne has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Castro and Merton L. Dillon. Their work appears in journals such as The Communication Review, Television & New Media, Media Culture & Society, Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies and Journal of cinema and media studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.