Michael Krams

65 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

Michael Krams
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Biological Psychiatry 356
  • Statistics and Probability 881
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.0k
  • Neurology 627
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 637
Replace Chengjie Xiong with:
Chengjie Xiong United States
Kaustubh Supekar United States
June Corwin United States
Jeanette A. Mumford United States
Valentina Moskvina United Kingdom
Merit Cudkowicz United States
Bernard Ravina United States
Li Su United Kingdom
Karen M. Rodrigue United States
Michael Krams relative to Chengjie Xiong United States Chengjie Xiong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Chengjie Xiong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Krams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Krams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Krams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Krams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Krams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Krams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Krams. The network helps show where Michael Krams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Krams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Krams Line = papers co-authored together Michael Krams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008422
2 1999364
3 2012336
4 1998330
5 2001320
6 2003316
7 2006284
8 1999274
9 2001251
10 1998236
11 2006197
12 2007125
13 2008116
14 2013104
15 200396
16 200788
17 200687
18 199976
19 200963
20 201657

About Michael Krams

Michael Krams is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 65 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (26 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (8 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (7 papers), S100 Proteins and Annexins (4 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (356 citations), Statistics and Probability (881 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.0k citations), Neurology (627 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (637 citations). Michael Krams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard E. Passingham, Matthew F. S. Rushworth, Ivan Toni, R.E. Passingham, Andrew P. Grieve, R. S. J. Frackowiak, Jaren W. Landen, Robert Turner, Frank S. Menniti and Kennedy R. Lees. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Information Journal, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, Stroke, NeuroImage and Clinical Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact