Michael Kometer

37 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Michael Kometer
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Clinical Psychology 2.6k
  • Biological Psychiatry 186
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Organic Chemistry 999
  • Sensory Systems 148
Replace Christopher B. Timmermann with:
Christopher B. Timmermann United Kingdom
Robin Lester Carhart-Harris United Kingdom
Mark Bolstridge United Kingdom
Erich Studerus Switzerland
Fernanda Palhano-Fontes Brazil
Natasha Leigh Mason Netherlands
Katherine A. MacLean United States
Manel J. Barbanoj Spain
Peter Hobden United Kingdom
Camilla Day United Kingdom
Michael Kometer relative to Christopher B. Timmermann United Kingdom Christopher B. Timmermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×100×150×208×
Christopher B. Timmermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kometer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kometer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kometer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kometer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kometer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kometer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kometer. The network helps show where Michael Kometer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kometer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kometer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kometer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010541
2 2010392
3 2012283
4 2013280
5 2012241
6 2019188
7 2011187
8 2017149
9 2015130
10 2019123
11 201296
12 201193
13 201679
14 201278
15 201070
16 201459
17 202055
18 202052
19 201351
20 201549

About Michael Kometer

Michael Kometer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Toxicology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (19 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (12 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.6k citations), Biological Psychiatry (186 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Organic Chemistry (999 citations) and Sensory Systems (148 citations). Michael Kometer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Franz X. Vollenweider, Erich Studerus, André Schmidt, Erich Seifritz, Felix Hasler, Milan Scheidegger, Lukasz Smigielski, Thomas Pokorny, Alex Gamma and Lutz Jäncke. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Biological Psychiatry and The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact