Michael King

2.5k citations
70 papers · 1.5k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Michael King

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael King
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
  • Public Administration 61
  • Clinical Psychology 363
  • Sociology and Political Science 636
  • Social Psychology 179
  • General Health Professions 183
Replace Irwin Deutscher with:
Irwin Deutscher United States
Carol A. B. Warren United States
Devon W. Carbado United States
Mark A. Chesler United States
Thomas Johansson Sweden
James Westfall Thompson United States
Jim Thomas United States
Stevi Jackson United Kingdom
Paul Rock United Kingdom
Duncan Chappell Australia
Michael King relative to Irwin Deutscher United States Irwin Deutscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Irwin Deutscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael King. The network helps show where Michael King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael King Line = papers co-authored together Michael King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011187
2 2003118
3 2015104
4 200292
5 200482
6 201963
7 200252
8 200751
9 198249
10 199345
11 197732
12 199431
13 199627
14 201427
15 201226
16 200425
17 198024
18
Te Ao Hurihuri : the world moves on : aspects of Maoritanga
197523
19 198122
20 198920

About Michael King

Michael King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (363 citations), Sociology and Political Science (636 citations), Social Psychology (179 citations) and General Health Professions (183 citations). Michael King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Donald M. Taylor, Chris Thornhill, Fuyuen Yip, Jacquelyn H. Clower, Alexia Papageorgiou, Donald Granberg, John Dawson, Oliver Davidson, Mikyong Shin and Cathy Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and Society, Contemporary Literature, Human Relations, Journal of Social Policy and International Journal of Intercultural Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact