Michael Keyl

1.2k citations
33 papers · 757 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Keyl

32 papers receiving 724 citations

Peers

Michael Keyl
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 583
  • Artificial Intelligence 581
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 149
  • Mathematical Physics 52
  • Geometry and Topology 27
Replace 雅則 大矢 with:
雅則 大矢 Italy
T. C. Dorlas Ireland
Volkher B. Scholz Switzerland
Salman Beigi Iran
Marian Grabowski Poland
Juha-Pekka Pellonpää Finland
Carlo Cafaro United States
Cédric Bény Germany
D. Petz Hungary
Ion Nechita France
Michael Keyl relative to 雅則 大矢 Italy 雅則 大矢's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
雅則 大矢 · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Keyl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Keyl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Keyl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Keyl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Keyl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Keyl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Keyl. The network helps show where Michael Keyl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael Keyl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Keyl Line = papers co-authored together Michael Keyl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002196
2 1999146
3 2001108
4 200554
5 200625
6 200222
7 200322
8 201621
9 200320
10 200118
11 201417
12 201416
13 200615
14 199112
15 19969
16 20108
17 20008
18 19937
19 20026
20 20084

About Michael Keyl

Michael Keyl is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (16 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (13 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Quantum many-body systems (4 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (583 citations), Artificial Intelligence (581 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (149 citations), Mathematical Physics (52 citations) and Geometry and Topology (27 citations). Michael Keyl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Reinhard F. Werner, D. Schlingemann, Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Paolo Perinotti, Francesco Buscemi, Robert Zeier, Thomas Schulte‐Herbrüggen, Taku Matsui, Jukka Kiukas and Hans Maassen. Their work appears in journals such as Reviews in Mathematical Physics, Quantum Information and Computation, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physics Letters B and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact