Michael Joseph Smith

717 citations
9 papers · 280 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Joseph Smith

8 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Michael Joseph Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Political Science and International Relations 227
  • Development 25
  • Philosophy 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 135
  • History 31
Replace Wilfried von Bredow with:
Wilfried von Bredow Germany
Richard Shapcott Australia
Anthony Lake United States
Piki Ish-Shalom Israel
Michael G. Baylor United States
Gil Merom Australia
Bradley S. Klein United States
J. L. Holzgrefe United States
Hans-Peter Gasser Switzerland
Jon Western United States
Michael Joseph Smith relative to Wilfried von Bredow Germany Wilfried von Bredow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Wilfried von Bredow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Joseph Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Joseph Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Joseph Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Joseph Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Joseph Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Joseph Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Joseph Smith. The network helps show where Michael Joseph Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Michael Joseph Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Joseph Smith Line = papers co-authored together Michael Joseph Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1987136
2 199290
3 199216
4 198913
5 198910
6
Diplomacy, Force, And Leadership: Essays In Honor Of Alexander L. George
19939
7 19974
8
Consensus : issues and problems
19851
9 19921

About Michael Joseph Smith

Michael Joseph Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 280 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (227 citations), Development (25 citations), Philosophy (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (135 citations) and History (31 citations). Michael Joseph Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gaddis Smith, Joseph Boyle, Murray Forsyth, Terry Nardin, R. J. Vincent, Chris Brown, Anthony E. Ellis, Thomas Donaldson, Michael Cartwright and Jack Donnelly. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics & International Affairs, The American Historical Review, Foreign Affairs, Medical Entomology and Zoology and University Press of America eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact