Dan Caldwell

435 citations
35 papers · 216 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Dan Caldwell

29 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers

Dan Caldwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 139
  • Development 15
  • Philosophy 31
  • Sociology and Political Science 90
  • Public Administration 6
Replace A. James Reichley with:
A. James Reichley United States
Steve Coll United States
Harold J. Laski United States
Otto Hintze
Wilfried von Bredow Germany
Andreas Anter Germany
Hartmut Behr United Kingdom
Michael R. Beschloss United States
John W. Chapman United Kingdom
P. Savigear United Kingdom
Dan Caldwell relative to A. James Reichley United States A. James Reichley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
A. James Reichley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan Caldwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Caldwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Caldwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Caldwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Caldwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Caldwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Caldwell. The network helps show where Dan Caldwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Dan Caldwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan Caldwell Line = papers co-authored together Dan Caldwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200642
2 197724
3 199119
4 197116
5 198710
6
Diplomacy, Force, And Leadership: Essays In Honor Of Alexander L. George
19939
7 19918
8 19838
9 19927
10 19787
11 19966
12 19796
13 20015
14 20095
15 20185
16 19854
17 19914
18 19824
19 19854
20 19913

About Dan Caldwell

Dan Caldwell is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Information Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (5 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (4 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers), Military and Defense Studies (2 papers) and Communism, Protests, Social Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (139 citations), Development (15 citations), Philosophy (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (90 citations) and Public Administration (6 citations). Dan Caldwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include R. E. O. Williams, Michael Krepon, Gregory F. Treverton, Michael Joseph Smith, Francis Fukuyama, Linda B. Miller, Timothy J. McKeown, John C. Campbell, Robert S. Litwak and Craig N. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Foreign Affairs, The Russian Review, International Studies Perspectives and Survival.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact