Michael J. Pro

646 citations
46 papers · 437 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Michael J. Pro

40 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Michael J. Pro
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Ophthalmology 312
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 52
  • Neurology 28
  • Neurology 11
Replace Juliane Matlach with:
Juliane Matlach Germany
Brian A. Francis United States
Marc Toeteberg-Harms Switzerland
Detlev Spiegel Germany
Sami Al-Shahwan Saudi Arabia
Fábio Nishimura Kanadani United States
Martha J. H. Tjon-Fo-Sang Netherlands
Mimiwati Binti Zahari Malaysia
Jinho Jeong South Korea
Claudia U. Richter United States
Michael J. Pro relative to Juliane Matlach Germany Juliane Matlach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Juliane Matlach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Pro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Pro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Pro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Pro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Pro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Pro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Pro. The network helps show where Michael J. Pro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Pro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Pro Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Pro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200669
2 202341
3 201440
4 201134
5 197820
6 201919
7 201418
8 201615
9 200414
10 202013
11 202013
12 202113
13 201910
14 201410
15 201310
16 20149
17 20118
18 20057
19 20207
20 20066

About Michael J. Pro

Michael J. Pro is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (32 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (2 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (312 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (76 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (52 citations), Neurology (28 citations) and Neurology (11 citations). Michael J. Pro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marlene R. Moster, L. Jay Katz, Jonathan S. Myers, Reza Razeghinejad, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, Robert Ritch, Daniel R. Lefton, Mauricio E Pons, Mark J. Kupersmith and George Link Spaeth. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Glaucoma, Ophthalmology Glaucoma, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, European Journal of Ophthalmology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact