Andrew Waldock

407 citations
12 papers · 326 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Waldock

12 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Andrew Waldock
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ophthalmology 263
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 177
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 42
  • Neurology 18
Replace J.–P. Nordmann with:
J.–P. Nordmann France
Donald Montgomery United Kingdom
Azadeh Doozandeh Iran
Seyed Ghazi‐Nouri United Kingdom
Ivana de Franco Italy
Connie Chou United States
Peter Hnik Canada
M Detry-Morel Belgium
Y. Trigo United States
Roberto Carassa Italy
Andrew Waldock relative to J.–P. Nordmann France J.–P. Nordmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
J.–P. Nordmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Waldock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Waldock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Waldock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Waldock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Waldock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Waldock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Waldock. The network helps show where Andrew Waldock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Waldock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Waldock Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Waldock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200067
2 199859
3 200055
4 199854
5 199829
6 199314
7 200012
8 199812
9 199710
10 20069
11 20004
12 19991

About Andrew Waldock

Andrew Waldock is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (263 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (177 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (42 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). Andrew Waldock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include David Steel, James P. Morgan, Michael Potts, Alan Cowey, Glen Jeffery, W S S Karwatowski, J M Sparrow, R A Harrad, Rohit Saxena and C.H. Karabatsas. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Eye, Advances in Therapy and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact