Ophthalmology Glaucoma

496 papers and 3.7k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 496 papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma usually cover Ophthalmology (440 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (306 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (49 papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (427 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (240 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ophthalmology Glaucoma are Felipe A. Medeiros, Robert N. Weinreb, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed, Siamak Yousefi, Brian C. Stagg, Michael H. Goldbaum, Michael V. Boland, Harry A. Quigley, Eun Ji Lee and Tae‐Woo Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma.

Countries where authors publish in Ophthalmology Glaucoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ophthalmology Glaucoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ophthalmology Glaucoma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026