Michael Hölzer

10.2k citations
217 papers · 6.4k · h-index 42

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Hölzer

203 papers receiving 6.0k citations

Peers

Michael Hölzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Emergency Medicine 3.8k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.7k
  • Internal Medicine 172
  • Neurology 629
  • Developmental Neuroscience 135
Replace Fritz Sterz with:
Fritz Sterz Austria
Stephen Bernard Australia
Romergryko G. Geocadin United States
Randall S. Friese United States
Francis X. Guyette United States
Brian P. Kavanagh Canada
Claudio Sandroni Italy
Terence O’Keeffe United States
Roger D. White United States
Rudolph W. Koster Netherlands
Michael Hölzer relative to Fritz Sterz Austria Fritz Sterz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fritz Sterz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hölzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hölzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hölzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hölzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hölzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hölzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hölzer. The network helps show where Michael Hölzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hölzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hölzer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hölzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 217 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005345
2 2001323
3 2000250
4 2000210
5 2016185
6 2014176
7 2016173
8 2010168
9 2006151
10 2005141
11 2004136
12 2004126
13 2012120
14 2011118
15 2007116
16 1999115
17 200995
18 200093
19 201090
20 201189

About Michael Hölzer

Michael Hölzer is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 217 papers that have together received 6.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (115 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (31 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (13 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (11 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (9 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (9 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (9 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (3.8k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.7k citations), Internal Medicine (172 citations), Neurology (629 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (135 citations). Michael Hölzer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fritz Sterz, Anton N. Laggner, Marcus Müllner, Harald Herkner, Wilhelm Behringer, Christof Havel, Heidrun Losert, Jasmin Arrich, Andrea Zeiner and Andreas Kliegel. Their work appears in journals such as Resuscitation, Critical Care Medicine, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact