Michael Hollenstein
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Papers in
-
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 6
-
- Dysphagia Assessment and Management 2
- Co-authors
- Mark R. Fox (10 shared papers)Benjamin Misselwitz (8 shared papers)Daphne Ang (6 shared papers)Rami Sweis (3 shared papers)Emily C. Tucker (2 shared papers)Jeff W. Wright (2 shared papers)K Knowles (1 shared paper)Kevin R. Knowles (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurogastroenterology & Motility (3 papers)Gastroenterology (2 papers)The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology (2 papers)Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1 paper)European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandSingaporeGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael Hollenstein
12 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Gastroenterology 312
- Speech and Hearing 108
- Surgery 208
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 12
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hollenstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hollenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hollenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hollenstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hollenstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hollenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hollenstein. The network helps show where Michael Hollenstein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hollenstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 109 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 |
About Michael Hollenstein
Michael Hollenstein is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Speech and Hearing, Ophthalmology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (6 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (2 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers), Engineering and Materials Science Studies (1 paper), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (1 paper) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (312 citations), Speech and Hearing (108 citations), Surgery (208 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (5 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (12 citations). Michael Hollenstein has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Singapore and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark R. Fox, Benjamin Misselwitz, Daphne Ang, Rami Sweis, Emily C. Tucker, Jeff W. Wright, K Knowles, Kevin R. Knowles, Henriette Sophie Heinrich and Werner Schwizer. Their work appears in journals such as Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Gastroenterology, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics and European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.