Michael Höck

1.3k citations
39 papers · 988 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Höck

37 papers receiving 922 citations

Peers

Michael Höck
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 356
  • Clinical Psychology 396
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 48
  • Social Psychology 298
Replace Lawrence R. Burns with:
Lawrence R. Burns United States
Roberta A. Mancuso United States
Denada Hoxha United States
Vicente E. Caballo Spain
John Franklin Australia
Victoria del Barrio Spain
Natasha Duell United States
Grace Icenogle United States
Judy I. Eidelson United States
Vincenzo Caretti Italy
Michael Höck relative to Lawrence R. Burns United States Lawrence R. Burns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lawrence R. Burns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Höck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Höck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Höck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Höck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Höck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Höck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Höck. The network helps show where Michael Höck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Höck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Höck Line = papers co-authored together Michael Höck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003117
2 1991115
3 200198
4 201188
5 200460
6 201856
7 199656
8 201650
9 201039
10 200237
11 198034
12 199727
13 202123
14 201520
15 201519
16 198519
17 201817
18 200817
19 199314
20
Das State-trait-Angst-Depressions-Inventar : STADI ; Manual
201313

About Michael Höck

Michael Höck is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (14 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (4 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (356 citations), Clinical Psychology (396 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations) and Social Psychology (298 citations). Michael Höck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Heinz Walter Krohne, Boris Egloff, Carl‐Walter Kohlmann, Lawrence R. Burns, Stefan C. Schmukle, Ellen Hock, Heike Eschenbeck, Christoph J. Kemper, Jochen Kaiser and Johannes Lütz. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Cognition & Emotion, Family Relations and Developmental Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact