Michael Gräf

79 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

Michael Gräf
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ophthalmology 217
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 192
  • Neurology 79
  • Epidemiology 298
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 141
Replace Lionel Kowal with:
Lionel Kowal Australia
Alina A. Zubcov Germany
Gill Roper-Hall United States
E. Bui Quoc France
Malcolm L. Mazow United States
Toshiaki Goseki Japan
G. Kolling Germany
Malcolm R. Ing United States
Clifford R. Weir United Kingdom
Dieter Schmidt Germany
Michael Gräf relative to Lionel Kowal Australia Lionel Kowal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Lionel Kowal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gräf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gräf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gräf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gräf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gräf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gräf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gräf. The network helps show where Michael Gräf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gräf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gräf Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gräf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201097
2 200035
3 199125
4 199822
5 200118
6 199917
7
Clinicopathologic reports, case reports, and small case series: congenital mydriasis, failure of accommodation, and patent ductus arteriosus.
200217
8 200015
9 200214
10 199912
11 201912
12 200712
13 200012
14 200011
15 201111
16 200010
17 201010
18 20059
19 19999
20 20128

About Michael Gräf

Michael Gräf is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 81 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (39 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (12 papers), Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (8 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (217 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (192 citations), Neurology (79 citations), Epidemiology (298 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (141 citations). Michael Gräf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Herbert J. Kaufmann, Ralph Becker, Birgit Lorenz, Götz Röderer, L. Kinzl, Florian Gebhard, Johannes Erhardt, Thomas Krzizok, Konstantinos Droutsas and Frank Weinand. Their work appears in journals such as Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Der Ophthalmologe, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma and Acta Ophthalmologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact