Malcolm R. Ing

34 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers

Malcolm R. Ing
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 554
  • Ophthalmology 196
  • Neurology 91
  • Neurology 49
  • Epidemiology 183
Replace Gill Roper-Hall with:
Gill Roper-Hall United States
Malcolm L. Mazow United States
Lionel Kowal Australia
A W Biglan United States
Alina A. Zubcov Germany
Elbert H. Magoon United States
Michael Gräf Germany
Keith W. McNeer United States
Trevor H. Kirkham Canada
Emma Dawson United Kingdom
Malcolm R. Ing relative to Gill Roper-Hall United States Gill Roper-Hall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Gill Roper-Hall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm R. Ing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm R. Ing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm R. Ing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm R. Ing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm R. Ing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm R. Ing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm R. Ing. The network helps show where Malcolm R. Ing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm R. Ing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm R. Ing Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm R. Ing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966139
2 1983103
3
Early surgical alignment for congenital esotropia.
198181
4 199561
5 199955
6 200252
7 199149
8 199349
9 198334
10 199428
11 199823
12 199920
13 201518
14 199618
15 199810
16 20048
17 20197
18 19797
19 19917
20 20066

About Malcolm R. Ing

Malcolm R. Ing is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (22 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (2 papers) and Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (554 citations), Ophthalmology (196 citations), Neurology (91 citations), Neurology (49 citations) and Epidemiology (183 citations). Malcolm R. Ing has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Frank D. Costenbader, Marshall M. Parks, Gregg T. Kokame, John J. Chen, Douglas Johnson, Donald A. Frambach, Jeffrey N. Weiss, Robert E. Engstrom, Jonathan W. Kim and David S. Boyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and Retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact