Malcolm R. Ing

33 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

Malcolm R. Ing
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ophthalmology 314
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 559
  • Neurology 143
  • Epidemiology 303
  • Neurology 65
Replace Gill Roper-Hall with:
Gill Roper-Hall United States
Malcolm L. Mazow United States
G. Kolling Germany
Lionel Kowal Australia
Michael Gräf Germany
Seung‐Hyun Kim South Korea
Alina A. Zubcov Germany
Emma Dawson United Kingdom
J-M Hwang South Korea
Figen Gökçay Türkiye
Malcolm R. Ing relative to Gill Roper-Hall United States Gill Roper-Hall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Gill Roper-Hall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm R. Ing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm R. Ing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm R. Ing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm R. Ing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm R. Ing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm R. Ing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm R. Ing. The network helps show where Malcolm R. Ing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm R. Ing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm R. Ing Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm R. Ing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966129
2 198397
3
Early surgical alignment for congenital esotropia.
198175
4 199556
5 199955
6 199147
7 200244
8 199344
9 198333
10 199425
11 199820
12 199920
13 199614
14 201514
15 199810
16 19797
17 19917
18 20197
19 20046
20 19866

About Malcolm R. Ing

Malcolm R. Ing is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (21 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (7 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (314 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (559 citations), Neurology (143 citations), Epidemiology (303 citations) and Neurology (65 citations). Malcolm R. Ing has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank D. Costenbader, Marshall M. Parks, Gregg T. Kokame, John J. Chen, Douglas Johnson, David A. Plager, Fred H. Lambrou, David S. Boyer, Donald A. Frambach and Jeffrey N. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and Retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact