Michael Goody

708 citations
15 papers · 521 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Goody

14 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Michael Goody
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Environmental Engineering 319
  • Computational Mechanics 397
  • Aerospace Engineering 450
  • Biomedical Engineering 118
  • Automotive Engineering 17
Replace W. Würz with:
W. Würz Germany
Emmanuel Jondeau France
Alexandros Vathylakis United Kingdom
Th. Lutz Germany
Yannian Yang China
Mathieu Gruber United Kingdom
Steve Martens United States
E. Pfizenmaier Germany
Thomas Le Garrec France
Thierry Maeder Netherlands
Michael Goody relative to W. Würz Germany W. Würz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W. Würz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Goody

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goody's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goody with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goody more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Goody

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goody. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goody. The network helps show where Michael Goody may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael Goody, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Goody Line = papers co-authored together Michael Goody links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2004353
2 200061
3 200025
4 199818
5 200214
6 200712
7 199911
8 19977
9 20086
10 20016
11 20074
12 20002
13 20081
14 19981
15 20080

About Michael Goody

Michael Goody is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (12 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (11 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (11 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (3 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers), Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies (1 paper), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (1 paper) and Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (319 citations), Computational Mechanics (397 citations), Aerospace Engineering (450 citations), Biomedical Engineering (118 citations) and Automotive Engineering (17 citations). Michael Goody has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger L. Simpson, Christopher J. Chesnakas, Semih Ölçmen, Theodore M. Farabee, William K. Blake, Meng Wang, Yu-Tai Lee, Stewart Glegg, William J. Devenport and Ki-Han Kim. Their work appears in journals such as AIAA Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Flow Turbulence and Combustion, 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit and 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact