Michael Goodwin
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications 4
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications 2
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Fred E. Regnier (2 shared papers)J. R. Chenault (1 shared paper)D. D. Kratzer (1 shared paper)Kim M. Gooding (1 shared paper)Delbert D. Thiessen (1 shared paper)Steven P. Swanson (1 shared paper)Todd A. Gillespie (1 shared paper)John T. Catlow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry (2 papers)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)Clinical Biochemistry (1 paper)Analytical Chemistry (1 paper)Journal of Chemical Ecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Goodwin
12 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Agronomy and Crop Science 143
- Sensory Systems 59
- Spectroscopy 129
- Genetics 148
- Animal Science and Zoology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Goodwin. The network helps show where Michael Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 137 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 122 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 97 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 74 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 71 | |
| 6 | 1977 | 63 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 58 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 1 |
About Michael Goodwin
Michael Goodwin is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Social Psychology and Computational Mechanics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (143 citations), Sensory Systems (59 citations), Spectroscopy (129 citations), Genetics (148 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (55 citations). Michael Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fred E. Regnier, J. R. Chenault, D. D. Kratzer, Kim M. Gooding, Delbert D. Thiessen, Steven P. Swanson, Todd A. Gillespie, John T. Catlow, W.M. Moseley and Romain Huguet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Journal of Animal Science, Clinical Biochemistry, Analytical Chemistry and Journal of Chemical Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.