Michael Gertner

795 citations
32 papers · 506 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Gertner

30 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Michael Gertner
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ophthalmology 227
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 163
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 87
  • Radiation 27
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 42
Replace Jonathan Smith with:
Jonathan Smith United Kingdom
Thomas C. Lee United States
Stefano Erba Italy
Olga Weijtens Netherlands
Byung Sik Kim South Korea
Yutaro Yamada Japan
Wiley Chambers United States
Chad A. Zarse United States
Masahiro Takahashi Japan
Michael Gertner relative to Jonathan Smith United Kingdom Jonathan Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Jonathan Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Gertner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Gertner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Gertner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Gertner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Gertner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Gertner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Gertner. The network helps show where Michael Gertner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Gertner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Gertner Line = papers co-authored together Michael Gertner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201349
2 201747
3 200444
4 200839
5 201031
6 201429
7 200929
8 200825
9 201624
10 202022
11 200619
12 201017
13 201017
14 201115
15 201214
16 201114
17 200312
18 201210
19 201310
20 20037

About Michael Gertner

Michael Gertner is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (227 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (163 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (87 citations), Radiation (27 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (42 citations). Michael Gertner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Darius M. Moshfeghi, Peter K. Kaiser, Electron Kebebew, Bilal M. Shafi, Carlos M. Mery, Gary Binyamin, Timothy L. Jackson, Denis O’Shaughnessy, Choonsik Lee and Roger W. Howell. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of Hypertension and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact