Michael G. Wing

1.8k citations
84 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael G. Wing

81 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael G. Wing
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Environmental Engineering 557
  • Geology 131
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 253
  • Ecology 435
  • Global and Planetary Change 338
Replace Zhongke Feng with:
Zhongke Feng China
Abdullah E. Akay Türkiye
Pinliang Dong United States
Mateo Gašparović Croatia
Juan de la Riva Spain
Francesca Giannetti Italy
Robert Keefe United States
Midhun Mohan United States
Stelian Alexandru Borz Romania
Federico Carotenuto Italy
Michael G. Wing relative to Zhongke Feng China Zhongke Feng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Zhongke Feng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Wing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Wing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Wing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Wing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Wing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Wing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Wing. The network helps show where Michael G. Wing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael G. Wing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael G. Wing Line = papers co-authored together Michael G. Wing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005244
2 2011139
3 201883
4 201165
5 200645
6 200732
7 200832
8 201428
9 200225
10 201425
11 200424
12 201324
13 201823
14 201723
15 201021
16 201121
17 200820
18 200620
19 201120
20 200317

About Michael G. Wing

Michael G. Wing is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (42 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (17 papers), Forest ecology and management (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (14 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (13 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (8 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (557 citations), Geology (131 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (253 citations), Ecology (435 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (338 citations). Michael G. Wing has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Aaron Eklund, L. D. Kellogg, John Sessions, Jonathan D. Burnett, Abdullah E. Akay, Arne E. Skaugset, Fatih Sivrikaya, Joanne F. Tynon, Leila Soledade Lemos and Leigh G. Torres. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forestry, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Forest Science, Remote Sensing and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact