Michael Friedman

969 citations
35 papers · 492 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Friedman

29 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Michael Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • History and Philosophy of Science 81
  • Gender Studies 153
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 281
  • Urban Studies 32
Replace Michael S. Sherry with:
Michael S. Sherry United States
Joan B. Landes United States
Robert E. Lerner United States
Richard D. Altick United States
Olivier Fillieule Switzerland
Neil Cooper United Kingdom
Thomas Docherty United Kingdom
George Cotkin United States
Emmanuel Renault France
Hew Strachan United Kingdom
Michael Friedman relative to Michael S. Sherry United States Michael S. Sherry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael S. Sherry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Friedman. The network helps show where Michael Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Michael Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200477
2
Dynamics of reason : the 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University
200162
3 200460
4 200457
5 201138
6
Immanuel Kant: Contents
200225
7 201024
8 200524
9
Kant and Hume on Causality
200815
10 197713
11 201412
12 200810
13 200510
14 20128
15 20206
16 19926
17 20105
18 19775
19 19835
20 20134

About Michael Friedman

Michael Friedman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Urban Studies, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (12 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (11 papers), Fluoride Effects and Removal (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), American Sports and Literature (3 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (81 citations), Gender Studies (153 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations), Sociology and Political Science (281 citations) and Urban Studies (32 citations). Michael Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Mason, David L. Andrews, Milena M. Parent, Michael Silk, Cathy van Ingen, Gary Hatfield, Peter Heath, Immanuel Kant, Henry E. Allison and Hilary Putnam. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Sport Journal, Monthly Review, Isis, Contemporary Theatre Review and International Review for the Sociology of Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact