Michael Fried

4.2k citations
104 papers · 2.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Fried

77 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Fried
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Theoretical Computer Science 279
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 237
  • Education 900
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 332
  • Literature and Literary Theory 274
Replace Elizabeth de Freitas with:
Elizabeth de Freitas United Kingdom
Yves Chevallard France
Frances A. Yates
David Topper Canada
Marx W. Wartofsky United States
Gregory Currie United Kingdom
Ole Skovsmose Denmark
Nathan Houser United States
Eric Livingston Australia
Gastón Bachelard United States
Michael Fried relative to Elizabeth de Freitas United Kingdom Elizabeth de Freitas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Elizabeth de Freitas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Fried

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Fried's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Fried with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Fried more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Fried

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Fried. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Fried. The network helps show where Michael Fried may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Fried, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Fried Line = papers co-authored together Michael Fried links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005379
2 1981203
3 1980197
4 2006195
5 2001123
6
The Tanner lectures on human values.
1988110
7 200585
8 198960
9 198258
10 198945
11 200744
12
Why photography matters as art as never before
200838
13 199830
14 200129
15 201327
16 198826
17 199425
18 200524
19 201322
20 200321

About Michael Fried

Michael Fried is a scholar working on Education, Theoretical Computer Science, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (20 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (18 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers), French Literature and Criticism (7 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (7 papers), French Literature and Poetry (5 papers), Historical Education Studies Worldwide (5 papers) and Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (279 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (237 citations), Education (900 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (332 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (274 citations). Michael Fried has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Haim Eshach, Barbara Maria Stafford, Miriam Amit, Sabetai Unguru, James Nagel, Uffe Thomas Jankvist, Victor Katz, Stuart Rowlands, Theodore Eisenberg and Osama Swidan. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Inquiry, ZDM, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, Educational Studies in Mathematics and The Art Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact