Michael Förg

450 citations
10 papers · 200 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Förg

10 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Michael Förg
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Materials Chemistry 130
  • General Decision Sciences 4
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 113
  • Applied Psychology 9
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 58
Replace Deming Hao with:
Deming Hao China
Tian-Yun Chang Taiwan
Aleš Vlk Czechia
Eduard Madirov Russia
Steven B. Sample United States
Ryan Taoran Wang Canada
Torsten Schmidt Germany
Muhammad Hasnain Ali Pakistan
Ahmad Marzuki Indonesia
Mattias Palsgaard Denmark
Michael Förg relative to Deming Hao China Deming Hao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Deming Hao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Förg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Förg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Förg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Förg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Förg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Förg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Förg. The network helps show where Michael Förg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Förg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Förg Line = papers co-authored together Michael Förg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201872
2 201960
3 200813
4 202113
5 200811
6 202410
7 200810
8
Vertrauen Bürger in der politischen Reformdiskussion noch der Meinung von Experten
20076
9 20224
10 20171

About Michael Förg

Michael Förg is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, General Decision Sciences and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 10 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 2D Materials and Applications (5 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (2 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Quantum Information and Cryptography (1 paper) and Photonic and Optical Devices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (130 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (113 citations), Applied Psychology (9 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (58 citations). Michael Förg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Högele, Jessica Lindlau, Eva Jonas, David Hunger, Friedrich Heinemann, Eva Traut‐Mattausch, Aditya D. Mohite, Takashi Taniguchi, Hisato Yamaguchi and Kenji Watanabe. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Physical Review Research, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik and Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact