Michael Ferber
Impact in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Moravian Church and William Blake
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Comparative and World Literature
- American and British Literature Analysis
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Historical and Literary Analyses
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
Papers in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 11
- Moravian Church and William Blake 8
- German Literature and Culture Studies 5
- Historical and Literary Analyses 4
- Comparative and World Literature 3
- Literature and Culture Studies 3
- Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics 3
- American and British Literature Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- James Chandler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Eighteenth-Century Studies (1 paper)Romanticism (1 paper)English Literary Renaissance (1 paper)Literature Compass (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Ferber
20 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Literature and Literary Theory 71
- Classics 12
- Music 5
- Philosophy 14
- Conservation 3
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Ferber
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Ferber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Ferber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Ferber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Ferber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Ferber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Ferber. The network helps show where Michael Ferber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Michael Ferber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 4 | Romanticism: A Very Short Introduction | 2010 | 15 |
| 5 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 9 | European Romantic Poetry | 2005 | 4 |
| 10 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 11 | The Poetry of Shelley | 1994 | 3 |
| 12 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1978 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About Michael Ferber
Michael Ferber is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Museology and Music, having authored 28 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (11 papers), Moravian Church and William Blake (8 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), Comparative and World Literature (3 papers), Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers), Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics (3 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (71 citations), Classics (12 citations), Music (5 citations), Philosophy (14 citations) and Conservation (3 citations). Michael Ferber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Chandler. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Romanticism, English Literary Renaissance and Literature Compass.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.