Michael E. Walsh

3.0k citations
58 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Walsh

55 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Michael E. Walsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Aging 188
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 673
  • Physiology 413
  • Materials Chemistry 728
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 46
Replace Wanghua Chen with:
Wanghua Chen France
Hirofumi Maruyama Japan
Wook Kim South Korea
Siva A. Vanapalli United States
Shi‐Li Zhang Sweden
Akira Morita Japan
Koji Okuda Japan
Hiroshi Inada Japan
Sabrina N. David Italy
Lili Niu China
Michael E. Walsh relative to Wanghua Chen France Wanghua Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Wanghua Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Walsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Walsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Walsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Walsh. The network helps show where Michael E. Walsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Walsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Walsh Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Walsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002293
2 2015279
3 1999219
4 2013155
5 2015142
6 2017126
7 2002114
8 201989
9 201581
10 200074
11 198370
12 201864
13 201449
14 201445
15 200742
16 201339
17 201633
18
A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes.
199430
19 201630
20 199430

About Michael E. Walsh

Michael E. Walsh is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physiology, Materials Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (7 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (6 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (3 papers) and Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (188 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (673 citations), Physiology (413 citations), Materials Chemistry (728 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (46 citations). Michael E. Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Holly Van Remmen, Henry I. Smith, Yun Shi, C. A. Ross, M. Farhoud, Moungi G. Bawendi, Hans‐Jürgen Eisler, Vikram C. Sundar, Victor I. Klimov and Arunabh Bhattacharya. Their work appears in journals such as Aging Cell, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Injury, Nature Communications and The FASEB Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact