Michael E. Thomas

221 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Michael E. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Ceramics and Composites 219
  • Finance 247
  • Theoretical Computer Science 23
  • Statistics and Probability 149
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 914
Replace W.F. Ames with:
W.F. Ames United States
J Crank United Kingdom
James Clerk Maxwell United Kingdom
Philipp Maass Germany
Jiequn Han United States
Nicolas Vandewalle Belgium
Claes Johnson Sweden
J. P. Bouchaud France
Alex Hansen Norway
Hiroshi Tanaka Japan
Michael E. Thomas relative to W.F. Ames United States W.F. Ames's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
W.F. Ames · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Thomas. The network helps show where Michael E. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 240 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007273
2 1997205
3 1985168
4 1984141
5 1988101
6 199883
7 200275
8 199865
9 199860
10 202058
11 198639
12 199435
13 199734
14 197932
15 198529
16 198229
17 197828
18 199627
19 200626
20 199026

About Michael E. Thomas

Michael E. Thomas is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 240 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (26 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (18 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (15 papers), Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies (15 papers), Glass properties and applications (14 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (14 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (13 papers) and Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (219 citations), Finance (247 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (23 citations), Statistics and Probability (149 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (914 citations). Michael E. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Rolf–Dieter Reiss, William J. Tropf, Richard I. Joseph, P BRUCE, John B. Goodenough, Robert J. Nordstrom, R. Beyers, Rodney Sinclair, Raymond M. Sova and Milton J. Linevsky. Their work appears in journals such as Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Applied Optics, Solid State Ionics and Archive for Mathematical Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact