Michael E. Rodgers

1.0k citations
31 papers · 938 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Rodgers

31 papers receiving 902 citations

Peers

Michael E. Rodgers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 260
  • Cell Biology 201
  • Molecular Biology 593
  • Molecular Medicine 38
  • Animal Science and Zoology 64
Replace Joyce R. Pearlstone with:
Joyce R. Pearlstone Canada
Terence P. Walsh Australia
Hiroshi Ohtsuka Japan
Bipasha Barua United States
Adam Szpacenko Canada
H L Weith United States
Dror S. Chorev United Kingdom
Jörg Bürger Germany
A.R. Cole United Kingdom
K. Suzuki Japan
Michael E. Rodgers relative to Joyce R. Pearlstone Canada Joyce R. Pearlstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joyce R. Pearlstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Rodgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Rodgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Rodgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Rodgers. The network helps show where Michael E. Rodgers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Rodgers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Rodgers Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Rodgers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984274
2 200282
3 200276
4 200759
5 199545
6 200341
7 197736
8 200933
9 198332
10 200630
11 200428
12 198728
13 199527
14 198520
15 200818
16 200217
17 200013
18 19989
19 19879
20 19869

About Michael E. Rodgers

Michael E. Rodgers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology, Genetics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (9 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (7 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (4 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (4 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (260 citations), Cell Biology (201 citations), Molecular Biology (593 citations), Molecular Medicine (38 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (64 citations). Michael E. Rodgers has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Peru. Frequent co-authors include William F. Harrington, Robert Schleif, Julien S. Davis, Trina A. Schroer, Stephen J. King, Allen Shearn, Hitoshi Ueno, David W. Rodgers, Ronald L. Koder and Chad Haynes. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Journal of Molecular Biology, Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Protein Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact