Michael E. Ravicz

66 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael E. Ravicz
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Otorhinolaryngology 1.3k
  • Sensory Systems 714
  • Developmental Biology 164
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 754
  • Neurology 183
Replace Willem F. S. Decraemer with:
Willem F. S. Decraemer Belgium
William T. Peake United States
Charles R. Steele United States
Sunil Puria United States
Richard L. Goode United States
Shyam M. Khanna United States
W. Robert J. Funnell Canada
Juergen Tonndorf United States
Anthony W. Gummer Germany
Isamu Sando United States
Michael E. Ravicz relative to Willem F. S. Decraemer Belgium Willem F. S. Decraemer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Willem F. S. Decraemer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Ravicz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Ravicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Ravicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Ravicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Ravicz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Ravicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Ravicz. The network helps show where Michael E. Ravicz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Ravicz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Ravicz Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Ravicz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008174
2 2007144
3 2000139
4 2005122
5 1996119
6 200494
7 200989
8 201086
9 200182
10 200781
11 199275
12 200862
13 200562
14 199960
15 200656
16 200249
17 199848
18 200948
19 200847
20 200647

About Michael E. Ravicz

Michael E. Ravicz is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Developmental Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Signal Processing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (38 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (22 papers), Marine animal studies overview (15 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (15 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (11 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (10 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (7 papers) and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (1.3k citations), Sensory Systems (714 citations), Developmental Biology (164 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (754 citations) and Neurology (183 citations). Michael E. Ravicz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Israel. Frequent co-authors include John J. Rosowski, Saumil N. Merchant, Jennifer R. Melcher, Hideko Heidi Nakajima, Wade W. Chien, William T. Peake, Elizabeth S. Olson, S. N. Merchant, Jeffrey Tao Cheng and Wei Dong. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research, Otology & Neurotology, Audiology and Neurotology and Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact