Michael E. Galbraith

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael E. Galbraith
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Applied Psychology 120
  • Oncology 326
  • Research and Theory 8
  • Clinical Psychology 187
  • Health 69
Replace Leeat Granek with:
Leeat Granek Israel
B. Ann Hilton Canada
Talia Zaider United States
Patricia A. Cross Canada
Ora Nakash Israel
Maria Gurevich Canada
Karen D. Fergus Canada
Giselle Katiria Perez United States
Catherine R Phillips Canada
Sheryle W. Alagna United States
Michael E. Galbraith relative to Leeat Granek Israel Leeat Granek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Leeat Granek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Galbraith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Galbraith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Galbraith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Galbraith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Galbraith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Galbraith. The network helps show where Michael E. Galbraith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Galbraith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Galbraith Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Galbraith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993231
2 1993208
3 200688
4 199375
5
Quality of life, health outcomes, and identity for patients with prostate cancer in five different treatment groups.
200157
6 200545
7 201140
8 201134
9 199233
10 200232
11 200830
12 199328
13 201627
14 200826
15 199124
16 199722
17 201220
18 201720
19 199518
20 201615

About Michael E. Galbraith

Michael E. Galbraith is a scholar working on Oncology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (120 citations), Oncology (326 citations), Research and Theory (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (187 citations) and Health (69 citations). Michael E. Galbraith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne C. Gagnon Thompson, Lenore M. Schwankovsky, et al, Sally H. Rankin, Jose Manuel Ramirez, Sharon Johnson, Erin O’Carroll Bantum, Sharon L. Sanders, Laura E. Hays and Regina M. Fink. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical journal of oncology nursing, Oncology nursing forum, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Seminars in Oncology Nursing and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact