Michael E. Day

1.2k citations
28 papers · 1.0k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Day

27 papers receiving 970 citations

Peers

Michael E. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 419
  • Global and Planetary Change 567
  • Atmospheric Science 234
  • Plant Science 484
  • Insect Science 130
Replace Anna Monrad Jensen with:
Anna Monrad Jensen Sweden
Eileen V. Carey United States
Thomas T. Lei Japan
Matjaž Čater Slovenia
Ralph S. Meldahl United States
C. Leuschner Germany
Elena Cubera Spain
Clarissa G. Fontes United States
Dominik Sperlich Spain
Hiroyuki Tobita Japan
Michael E. Day relative to Anna Monrad Jensen Sweden Anna Monrad Jensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Anna Monrad Jensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Day. The network helps show where Michael E. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Day Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001147
2 2002133
3 2002126
4 2000120
5 200785
6 200557
7 200856
8 200635
9 201133
10 201032
11 201230
12 201621
13 200421
14 200921
15 200820
16 200915
17 200415
18 201615
19 200612
20 201510

About Michael E. Day

Michael E. Day is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (14 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (10 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (5 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (419 citations), Global and Planetary Change (567 citations), Atmospheric Science (234 citations), Plant Science (484 citations) and Insect Science (130 citations). Michael E. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and China. Frequent co-authors include Michael Scott Greenwood, Alan S. White, Robert G. Wagner, Shawn Fraver, Carmen Díaz‐Sala, B. J. Bond, Richard Jagels, C. M. Cooper, Ivan J. Fernandez and Maria Alejandra Equiza. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Forest Ecology and Management, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, HortScience and Trees.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact