Michael Dörr

89 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Michael Dörr
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Human-Computer Interaction 642
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 919
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 782
  • Ophthalmology 316
  • Sensory Systems 154
Replace Jeff B. Pelz with:
Jeff B. Pelz United States
Derrick Parkhurst United States
Alexander C. Schütz Germany
Claudio M. Privitera United States
Oleg V. Komogortsev United States
Preeti Verghese United States
Juno Kim Australia
Bosco S. Tjan United States
Risto Näsänen Finland
Xoana G. Troncoso United States
Michael Dörr relative to Jeff B. Pelz United States Jeff B. Pelz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jeff B. Pelz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Dörr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Dörr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Dörr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Dörr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Dörr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Dörr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Dörr. The network helps show where Michael Dörr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Dörr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Dörr Line = papers co-authored together Michael Dörr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010311
2 2014263
3 2012160
4 201395
5 201876
6 201472
7 201564
8 201850
9 201345
10 201238
11 201133
12
Gaze beats mouse: A case study
200732
13 200832
14 200928
15 201728
16 201527
17 200627
18 201926
19 201726
20 201525

About Michael Dörr

Michael Dörr is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (41 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (37 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (31 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (14 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (12 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (6 papers) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (642 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (919 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (782 citations), Ophthalmology (316 citations) and Sensory Systems (154 citations). Michael Dörr has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Erhardt Barth, Thomas Martinetz, Eleonora Vig, Peter J. Bex, David Cox, Karl R. Gegenfurtner, Mikhail Startsev, Zhong‐Lin Lu, Halszka Jarodzka and Katharina Scheiter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Scientific Reports, Neuropsychologia and Translational Vision Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact