Michael Day

1.2k citations
23 papers · 911 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant responses to elevated CO2 9
    • Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 4
    • Plant Disease Management Techniques 2
    • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 13

Michael Day

23 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Michael Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 375
  • Global and Planetary Change 511
  • Plant Science 422
  • Atmospheric Science 203
  • Insect Science 122
Replace Matjaž Čater with:
Matjaž Čater Slovenia
Anna M. Jensen Sweden
Thomas T. Lei Japan
Srđan Stojnić Serbia
Walter Seidling Germany
Ingmar Tulva Estonia
Yasuhiro Utsumi Japan
Thomas Kuster Switzerland
Dirk Vanderklein United States
Shijie Han China
Michael Day relative to Matjaž Čater Slovenia Matjaž Čater's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Matjaž Čater · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Day. The network helps show where Michael Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Day Line = papers co-authored together Michael Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001141
2 2002133
3 2002115
4 2000113
5 200772
6 200556
7 200852
8 200630
9 201028
10 201227
11 200919
12 201618
13 200818
14 200916
15 201615
16 200414
17 201510
18 20029
19 20149
20 20068

About Michael Day

Michael Day is a scholar working on Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (13 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (9 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (4 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Plant Disease Management Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (375 citations), Global and Planetary Change (511 citations), Plant Science (422 citations), Atmospheric Science (203 citations) and Insect Science (122 citations). Michael Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Greenwood, Alan S. White, Robert G. Wagner, Shawn Fraver, Carmen Díaz‐Sala, B. J. Bond, Ivan J. Fernandez, G. B. Wiersma, C. M. Cooper and Richard Jagels. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Physiology, Forest Ecology and Management, HortScience, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Sustainable Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact