Michael D. Mitchell

26 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

Michael D. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Pharmacology 235
  • Catalysis 52
  • Hepatology 28
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 63
  • Oncology 82
Replace Hongbin Yu with:
Hongbin Yu China
Toshihide Takagi Japan
Yasuhiro Iwata Japan
Haibo Song China
Daniel Bauer Switzerland
Siyu Fu China
Franklin G. King United States
Swaroop Kumar Pandey India
Michael D. Mitchell relative to Hongbin Yu China Hongbin Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Hongbin Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Mitchell. The network helps show where Michael D. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005259
2 198462
3 201548
4 200640
5 201136
6 199931
7 200629
8 200727
9 200825
10 200823
11 200821
12 197620
13 200611
14 20149
15 20168
16 20068
17 19786
18 19874
19 20174
20 20123

About Michael D. Mitchell

Michael D. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Pharmacology and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 683 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (2 papers), Membrane Separation Technologies (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers) and Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (235 citations), Catalysis (52 citations), Hepatology (28 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (63 citations) and Oncology (82 citations). Michael D. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennie Walgren, David C. Thompson, M. Albert Vannice, Henny C. van der Mei, Mollisa M. Elrick, Dimitris I. Collias, Henk J. Busscher, David C. Thompson, Timothy G. Brayman and Dale L. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Toxicological Sciences, Plastic Surgical Nursing, Biochemical Pharmacology and Pharmacology Research & Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact